You are currently viewing the old version of the website.
From December 5, 2019 the website is available at: and
Follow Us

Institute for Law and Public Policy

Address: 129090, Moscow, Shchepkina str., 8

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 140, Moscow, 129090, Russia

Tel.: +7 (495) 608 6959, 608 6635; Fax: +7 (495) 608 6915

Our location

20.04.2018 On March 28, 2018, the Institute held а webinar "On the Ulterior Purpose of Restrictions on Rights: the Case of Merabishvili against Georgia in the European Court of Human Rights"

On March 28, 2018 the Institute lawyer Dimitriу Mednikov conducted a webinar, during which he analyzed the decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights of November 28, 2017, in the case of Merabishvili against Georgia (application no. 72508/13).

The webinar was attended by 36 participants including attorneys (17), lawyers (9), representatives of the academia (10) from 12 Russian regions (Moscow, St. Petersburg, Kazan, Yekaterinburg, Kaliningrad, Nizhny Novgorod, Sochi, Solnechnogorsk Moscow Region), Voronezh, Novosibirsk, Sovietsky (Yugra) and Sevastopol), as well as from Stockholm.

During the webinar, the following issues were considered:

  • How did the case law of the European Court on Article 18 of the Convention evolve?
  • Are rights of an applicant violated if a State interference pursues both a restriction purpose prescribed by the Convention and an ulterior purpose?
  • How to prove a violation of Article 18 of the Convention?

The review of the decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights of the case of Merabishvili v. Georgia was published in April in No. 1 (25) of the International Justice Journal for 2018.

Video recording of the webinar is available here.

The webinar was held as part of the project Using Constitutional and International Justice Mechanisms to Strengthen Human Rights Capabilities of the Russian Advokatura.

All Events

Stay in the Loop!
The Moot Court Competition on Constitutional Justice 'Crystal Themis'
The Moot Court Competition on Constitutional Justice