You are currently viewing the old version of the website.
From December 5, 2019 the website is available at: and
Follow Us

Institute for Law and Public Policy

Address: 129090, Moscow, Shchepkina str., 8

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 140, Moscow, 129090, Russia

Tel.: +7 (495) 608 6959, 608 6635; Fax: +7 (495) 608 6915

Our location
“Meždunarodnoe pravosudie” (International Justice) Journal

№ 2(22) 2017. Tatyana Neshataeva. The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union: from legal opinion to the effective law

Tatyana Neshataeva - Doctor of Sciences in Law, Professor of Law, Judge of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union, Minsk, Republic of Belarus.

DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2017-2-64-79

Abstract. The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU Court) plays a significant role in strengthening Eurasian integration. This Court is a major judicial body of the Union responsible for the legal regulation of relations and the settlement of disputes both between member states and between economic and business entities. The principal operative form of the EAEU Court work is the interpretation of the law of the Union, ensuring legal uniformity and judicial control in the sphere of implementation of the legal norms. One of the main functions of the Court is formal, systemic configuration of the norms of Eurasian law in order to fill the gaps in Union law through the formulation of judicial legal opinions (judicial rules) that consolidate all types of legal regulation that are stipulated by the treaties and are reflected in common unified, coordinated and coherent policies of the EAEU. The Court interprets the norms of international treaties, the decisions of international bodies and the actions of the authorities of the member states. The Court also develops legal opinions on understanding international and supranational legal norms and implementation of these norms, and – in controversial situations – quickly and efficiently covers the existing gaps, eliminates ambiguities and uncertainty in Union law with the aim of eliminating the problematic issues in the process of current Union law enforcement and norm implementation in the member states. At the same time, the important function of the Court is construing the content of the legal act for real norm implementation by its interpretation, as well as betaking the accumulated experience contained in the special – concurring and dissenting – opinions of judges and judicial precedents in the case law of international and supranational courts.

Keywords: Court of the EAEU; international standard control; implementation of supranational norms; precedents; case law; interpretation of international norms; legal opinion; elimination of legal uncertainty.

Citation: Neshataeva T. (2017) Sud Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza: ot pravovoy pozitsii k deystvuyushchemu pravu [The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union: from legal opinion to the effective law]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, no.2, pp.64–79. (In Russian).


Alekseev S.S. (1982) Obshchaya teoriya prava: v 2 t. T.2. [The general theory of law: in 2 vols. Vol.2], Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura. (In Russian).

Antsupov A.Ya. Shipilov A.I. (2006) Slovar' konfliktologa [A conflictologist’s dictionary], Saint Petersburg: Piter. (In Russian).

Barak A. (1999) Sudeyskoe usmotrenie: Per. s angl. [Judicial discretion: Transl. from English], Moscow: Norma. (In Russian).

Dworkin R. (1977) Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ershova E.A., Ershov V.V. (2007) Pretsedenty tolkovaniya Evroppeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka [Pecedents of interpretation in jurisprudence of The European Court of Human Rights]. Rossiyskoe pravosudie, no.7, pp.12–25. (In Russian).

Gray J.Ch. (1921) The Nature and Sources of the Law, 2nd ed., New York: R.Gray.

Hart H.L.A. (1961) The Concept of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jacob M. (2014) Precedents and Case-based Reasoning in the European Court of Justice: unfinished Business, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Karapetov A.G. (2011) Bor'ba za priznanie sudebnogo pravotvorchestva v evropeyskom i amerikanskom prave (Struggling for the recognition of the judicial law-making in the European and Americal law], Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).

Kelsen H. (1967) The Pure Theory of Law, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Kharris D., O'Boyl M., Uorbrik K. (2016) Pravo Evropeyskoy Konventsii po pravam cheloveka [Harris D., O'Boyle M., Warbrick C. Law of the European Convention on Human Rights], Moscow: Razvitie pravovykh sistem. (In Russian).

Kischel U. (2015) Rechtsvergleichung, München: C.H.Beck.

Marchenko M.N. (2011) Sudebnoye pravotvorchestvo i sudebnoe pravo [Judicial law-making and judicil law], Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russian).

Neshtaeva T.N. (ed.) (2015) Evraziyskaya integratsiya: rol' Suda [Eurazian integration: the role of the Court], Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).

Neshataeva T. (2016) O problemakh v deystvii resheniy organov EAES v natsional'nykh pravoporyadkakh gosydarstv-chlenov [On ambiguous effects of the EAEU bodies’ decisions within national legal systems of the member states]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, no.3, pp.10–17. (In Russian).

Nikitin S.V. (2010) Sudebnyy kontrol' v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Judicial control in civil and arbitration procedure], Moscow: RAP; Wolters Kluver. (In Russian).

Raz J. (1979) The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, New York: Oxford University Press.

Raz J. (1999) Practical Reason and Norms, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Svetlov V.A., Semyonov V.A. (2011) Konfliktologiya [Conflictology], Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo Mezhparlamentskoy assamblei Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva. (In Russian).

Vlasenko L.V. (2011) Nalogovye pravovye pozitsii sudov: teoriya i praktika [Legal opinion of the courts in taxation cases], Moscow: Norma; Infra-M. (In Russian).

Yablochkov T.M. (1909) Kurs mezhdunarodnogo grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava [A treatise on international civil procedural law], Yaroslavl: Tipografiya Gubernskogo Pravleniya. (In Russian).

Zaytsev V.V., Zaytsev O.V. (2014) Pravovye pozitsii: ponyatie i yuridicheskoe znachenie [Legal opinion: definition and legal role]. Pravo i ekonomika, no.7, pp.4–8. (In Russian).

Stay in the Loop!
The Moot Court Competition on Constitutional Justice 'Crystal Themis'
The Moot Court Competition on Constitutional Justice